Evaluation for Question #8586

There is an ongoing discussion that preserving the environment should be the liability of politicians since individuals appear to make little contribution. Personally, I partially agree with this idea because the government can own the power to make real differences in society, while individuals can not reach that extent, but they are the main factors in adopting positive changes in protecting the environment.

Considering firstly the impactful contribution of individuals, an important one is that people can do small daily activities to reduce pollution in environmental surroundings. For instance, they can take actions by consuming less waste, conserving energy, and supporting eco-friendly practices, which can alleviate some burdens on the government. Furthermore, the boycottingboycotting power of the people is really awkwardly incredible;, they have the right to refuse to buy services or goods. This leads to the shift in the authority’s methods of production and some different measures to reduce the impact on the environment. However, all of those must able to be done in reunification, not just only one individual, so it is apparent that we need more easily observable change in protecting the environment, inenvironment which politicians and government bodies come into play.

First and foremost, the government can enact and enforce laws and regulations to restrict the amount of waste discharged to the environment. Protecting natural resources, mitigating pollution, and conserving biodiversity are incorporated in the legislation. A good example of this is inAustralia, where Australia, individuals and companies have to pay a fine of AUS 1000 - AUS 5000 for any damage to the nature. In some cases, the fines are heavier, and people could even face time in prison. As a result, this is a really must - obey action for their residents, which can reduce illegitimate natural destroying crimes such as deforestation or overfishing. Secondly, environmental protection programs often require colossal funds, which significantly exceed what any individual can afford. To be honest, the larger the impactfulimpactful program, the more prohibitively exorbitant it is. As the government can totally make all the decisions due to their essential resource procession and have the ability for suitable marketing ads to draw more people’s attention. Additionally, they are also a legal community, so they can earn the trust of the residents. For example,the UN UN Environment Programme (UNEP) is a workplace of the politicians, running a crowdfunding strategy strategies to successfully organise green projects for global inhabitants. Consequently, the authority can create more worldwide movements, changing many viewpoints and activities of many people.

In conclusion, in spite of the influence of individuals in environmental protection, I believe it is indispensible that the responsibilities of the politicians and governments are the only one long-lasting solution to deal with global warming problems by introducing laws and promoting environmental consciousness consiousness in this day and age.