Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The essay presents an attempt to address the task, but it lacks development and clarity. The arguments are incomplete and do not sufficiently cover the topic. The essay requires better organization and expansion of ideas to improve coherence and task response.
The essay attempts to address the task but does so inadequately. The argument that the government should be responsible for environmental protection is initiated but not developed. The opposing viewpoint, which assigns responsibility to individuals, is mentioned but not explored. The essay lacks a clear thesis and fails to provide a balanced discussion of both perspectives.
The essay lacks clear coherence and cohesion. Ideas are not well connected, and the progression of the argument is unclear. The introduction does not effectively set up the discussion, and the body paragraphs are not logically organized. The conclusion is missing, leaving the essay incomplete.
The vocabulary used in the essay is limited and contains several errors, such as 'evidences' and 'believes'. There is a lack of variety in word choice, and some phrases are awkward or incorrect. More precise and varied vocabulary is needed to clearly convey the arguments.
The essay contains several grammatical inaccuracies, including incorrect subject-verb agreement and awkward sentence structures. Errors such as 'In today world' and 'the authority should be in charge of this' affect the clarity of the writing. Improved sentence construction and grammar are needed to enhance readability.