Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Question
Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Your Essay
Câu chứa lỗi
Gợi ý sửa
Giải thích
You can edit this text for your reference. Changes will not be saved.
5.5
Overall Band
6
Task Response
5
Coherence
5
Lexical
5
Grammar
The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position, but it struggles with clarity and coherence. The introduction and conclusion are somewhat effective, but the body paragraphs require better organization and development of ideas. Lexical resources and grammatical accuracy are limited, with frequent errors that affect readability.
The essay addresses the task and presents a clear opinion on the issue. However, it lacks depth in the argumentation and does not sufficiently develop the reasons why individuals play a more significant role. The balance between discussing the roles of politicians and individuals needs improvement.
While the essay has a basic structure, the ideas are not always logically organized or clearly linked. Transitions between ideas and paragraphs are weak, making it difficult for the reader to follow the argument. The use of cohesive devices is limited and sometimes inappropriate.
The essay uses a limited range of vocabulary, with some errors in word choice and spelling. There is repetition of words and phrases, and some expressions are awkward or incorrect. More variety and precision in vocabulary usage are needed to enhance clarity and impact.
The essay contains frequent grammatical errors, including issues with subject-verb agreement, sentence structure, and punctuation. These errors often impede comprehension. Greater grammatical accuracy and variety in sentence structures are needed to improve readability.
Detailed Analysis by Paragraph
Question:
Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Introduction
Many studies have been able to illustrate the connection between the transportation of products and civilons and environmental harm. This has sparked a heated debate between people, while some think that lawmakers are those to be held accountable, others believe individuals also play a role. In this essays, both views about whose responsibility will be looked through clearly, concluding with my view on why normal people's role is more remarkable.
The introduction presents the topic but includes some unclear expressions and grammatical errors. The thesis statement is present but could be more concise and specific about the position being taken.
Body paragraph 1
Granted, government officials should take more responsibilities on this topic. Inadequate policies fail to prevent the delivery of products and commuting of vehicle from emissing gases. Their gases noticeably contribute to harming the environment, worsen the polluting problem. Politicians should extend the public transportation system to encourage more people to stop utilizing personal vehicles. With the construction of more motor railwa yand more busses route, more people will use them as it can be more convenient and better for the ecosystem.
The paragraph attempts to discuss the role of politicians but is marred by frequent grammatical errors and unclear expressions. More specific examples and clearer development of the argument are needed.
Body paragraph 2
Those can be the reason why some people may think government should be incharge of the problem, however, I personally believe that individuals play a more indispensable role on the topic of environment. Overconsumption of people is the main causes of the huge transportation flow. This is often overlooked as present satisfaction is often prioritized over long term sustainability for many civilans. Beside, individuals are able to choose public vehicle over personal car. Such preferences can largely improve the ecosystem. Take Japan as a prine example, the locals often use public transportation which help the country remain one of the cleanest, least polluted nation on earth.
The paragraph presents the role of individuals but lacks coherence and clear logical progression. The example of Japan is relevant but not well integrated into the argument. More detailed exploration of the points is necessary.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while politicians should be put in charge, individuals also need to take fault of the environment problem. In the long run, if both civilans and government are able to work on the topic together, we will be able to get the greatest outcome.
The conclusion summarizes the main points but is somewhat vague. It could be strengthened by reiterating the specific arguments made in the essay and providing a more compelling final statement.
Sign In
[nextend_social_login]
or sign in with email
The password must have a minimum of 8 characters of numbers and letters, contain at least 1 capital letter
Cô Huyền sẽ liên hệ trực tiếp với bạn qua email hoặc điện thoại trong 1-2 ngày tới để trao đổi cụ thể hơn về việc học.
Hoặc bạn cũng có thể chủ động liên hệ với cô giáo theo thông tin dưới đây để được xếp lớp sớm nhất.
(+84) 0383-096-717
Email: huyenbui@cohuyenielts.com
Xin cám ơn.
ĐĂNG KÝ HỌC IELTS VỚI CÔ HUYỀN
Để đăng ký học IELTS lớp cô Huyền, vui lòng điền form dưới đây để được tư vấn. Hoặc gọi điện trực tiếp cho cô giáo theo số +84.0383.096.717 để giữ chỗ.
Để đăng ký nhanh nhất, vui lòng liên hệ trực tiếp cho cô Huyền theo số:
(+84) 0383-096-717
Email: huyenbui@cohuyenielts.com
Địa chỉ: 63 Vũ Ngọc Phan, Láng Hạ, Đống Đa, Hà Nội