Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution. Some people believe the government should be in charge of this, while others believe it is the fault of individuals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Question
Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution. Some people believe the government should be in charge of this, while others believe it is the fault of individuals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Your Essay
Câu chứa lỗi
Gợi ý sửa
Giải thích
You can edit this text for your reference. Changes will not be saved.
6.5
Overall Band
7
Task Response
6
Coherence
6
Lexical
6
Grammar
The essay presents a clear discussion on both views regarding the responsibility for pollution caused by transportation. The writer effectively presents arguments for the role of both the government and individuals. However, the essay could benefit from more precise language and improved coherence in some areas. Grammatical errors and awkward phrasing occasionally detract from the clarity of the argument.
The essay addresses both views on the issue and provides a clear opinion. The writer supports their argument with relevant examples and explanations. However, the discussion could be more balanced by expanding on the counterarguments and providing more evidence to support the individual's role in pollution reduction.
The essay has a logical structure with clear paragraphing. However, some transitions between ideas are abrupt, and the use of cohesive devices is limited. Improved linking between sentences and paragraphs would enhance the flow of the essay.
The vocabulary is adequate for the task, but there are instances of awkward phrasing and inappropriate word choices. The essay could benefit from a wider range of vocabulary and more precise language to convey the arguments more effectively.
The essay contains several grammatical errors, such as incorrect verb forms, subject-verb agreement issues, and awkward sentence structures. These errors occasionally hinder the clarity of the argument. More complex sentence structures could also be used to demonstrate a higher level of grammatical range.
Detailed Analysis by Paragraph
Question:
Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution. Some people believe the government should be in charge of this, while others believe it is the fault of individuals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Introduction
It has been shown that the major cause of pollution is the transportation of goods and human. While some hold the view that the government should take accountability for this issue, others believe individuals are the ones who predominantly contribute to environmental degradation. From my perspective, although the government can tackle with this problem using their authority and abundant resources, I believe each individual can take part in alleviating the pollution by bringing out collective actions such as changing consumption patterns and adapting to a more eco-friendly lifestyle, as I will further elaborate in this essay.
The introduction clearly outlines the topic and presents both viewpoints, along with the writer's opinion. However, there is a grammatical error in 'tackle with this problem,' which should be 'tackle this problem.'
Body paragraph 1
First, it is conspicuous that the government possesses the authority and rich resources that other individuals lack of. By introducing legislative measures, such as enacting new laws or imposing strict regulations, the government can effectively curb over-exploitation, thereby restoring the eco-system. For instance, Vietnam’s government once implemented rules on deforestation, discouraging companies and factories to exploit wood. As a result, a significant amount of trees had been preserved. Moreover, the government is the sole entity that has the capability to subsidizing renewable energy and utilize it in a large scale. Because of that, the authorities can introduce incentives in order to promote eco-friendly sources of energy, thus mitigating the burden of environmental degradation on the country.
The paragraph presents a strong argument for the government's role in addressing pollution, supported by an example. However, there are some grammatical errors, such as 'lack of' instead of 'lack,' and 'to subsidizing' instead of 'to subsidize.'
Body paragraph 2
While law makers can preserve natural habitat via their authority and resources, I strongly believe that each individual can also contribute to saving the environment through the power of collective actions. First, individuals can start with simple but practical actions, such as turn off the light after using, or shower for a shorter time in order to save water. These small actions may seem trivial and insignificant; however, if they are done by thousand, or even million of individuals, then the impact on the environment would be multiplied. As a result, the eco-system could drastically improved, solidifying the power of individuals. Additionally, in the role of customers, individuals can transition to more eco-friendly market trends, and boycott companies that use harmful chemical in their products. Due to this shift in consumer’s behavior, those who want too remain in the industry must adapt to more environmentally friendly materials, thus reducing the amount of unnecessary waste in their industrial operation.
The paragraph effectively argues for the individual's role in reducing pollution through collective actions. However, there are grammatical issues, such as 'turn off the light' should be 'turning off the lights,' and 'thousand, or even million' should be 'thousands, or even millions.'
Conclusion
In conclusion, although the government possesses the authority and rich resources to enact strict laws to prevent over-expoiltation and to promote renewable energy, I believe that each individual can also adapt to a more sustainable lifestyle and shift their consumer’s behaviour in order to preserve the natural habitat.
The conclusion summarizes the main points well and reiterates the writer's opinion. However, there is a spelling error in 'over-expoiltation,' which should be 'over-exploitation.'
Sign In
[nextend_social_login]
or sign in with email
The password must have a minimum of 8 characters of numbers and letters, contain at least 1 capital letter
Cô Huyền sẽ liên hệ trực tiếp với bạn qua email hoặc điện thoại trong 1-2 ngày tới để trao đổi cụ thể hơn về việc học.
Hoặc bạn cũng có thể chủ động liên hệ với cô giáo theo thông tin dưới đây để được xếp lớp sớm nhất.
(+84) 0383-096-717
Email: huyenbui@cohuyenielts.com
Xin cám ơn.
ĐĂNG KÝ HỌC IELTS VỚI CÔ HUYỀN
Để đăng ký học IELTS lớp cô Huyền, vui lòng điền form dưới đây để được tư vấn. Hoặc gọi điện trực tiếp cho cô giáo theo số +84.0383.096.717 để giữ chỗ.
Để đăng ký nhanh nhất, vui lòng liên hệ trực tiếp cho cô Huyền theo số:
(+84) 0383-096-717
Email: huyenbui@cohuyenielts.com
Địa chỉ: 63 Vũ Ngọc Phan, Láng Hạ, Đống Đa, Hà Nội